Measures to Strengthen the Effectiveness of Corporate Governance
The Company conducts an annual evaluation on the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, and strives to continuously enhance the functions and effectiveness of the Board of Directors from the two viewpoints of “enhancing trust from stakeholders (creating social value)” and “improving organizational performance (enhancing corporate value).” We work on the improvement measures for issues identified by the evaluation, and confirm the status of improvement during the evaluation of the Board of Directors in the following fiscal year, while at the same time continuing to confirm the evaluation of the current issues.
Evaluation Process
Starting from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, we have changed to a method of analyzing and/or evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors using a third-party evaluation design (including, among other things, preparation and analysis of questionnaire survey as well as comparison with other companies, identifying issues, drafting action plans).
The analysis and/or evaluation based on the questionnaire survey and interviews using the third-party evaluation design is conducted every other year. During the interval year, we focus on initiatives to improve the issues identified from the questionnaire survey, while at the same time conducting evaluation through monitoring and by collecting opinions at the Independent External Auditors & Directors Meeting for the Effectiveness of Board of Directors.
As for the Evaluation on Effectiveness for the current fiscal year (ended March 31, 2024), we updated the evaluation design using a third party aiming “to secure objectivity and extract issues from the viewpoint of external parties,” and set new evaluation items as follows.
- a. Confirmation of the status of improvement measures of the current fiscal year for the issues identified based on the results of the Evaluation on Effectiveness for the previous fiscal year (ended March 31, 2023)
- b. The way the Board of Directors should be for the improvement of the medium- and long-term corporate value, etc., including the discussion about the revision of the medium-term management plan announced in November 2023, considering the severe management environment surrounding the Group these days We conducted a questionnaire survey to all of the Directors and Audit and Supervisory Board Members.
Then, with the interview with a third party and the Secretariat of the Independent External Auditors & Directors Meeting for the Effectiveness of Board of Directors, we scrutinized their answers of the questionnaire and their awareness of issues and asked their opinions on the future roles and responsibilities of Directors and the improvement measures to enhance the effectiveness of the Board of Directors.
The evaluation items of the questionnaire survey are as follows:
- a. roles and/or responsibilities of the Board of Directors
- b. structure of the Board of Directors
- c. quality of discussions (agendas, content of materials, etc.)
- d. constructive dialogues with stakeholders
As mentioned above, we analyzed the answers and extracted issues based on a third party’s advice, and consolidated improvement measures Then, the improvement measures are discussed at the Independent External Auditors & Directors Meeting freely, and recommendations are provided to the Board of Directors.
Evaluation Results of Effectiveness and Progress on Initiatives for Improvement
With the deliberation by the Board of Directors based on the answers to the questionnaire survey and the opinions collected through the interview, we confirmed that deep and quality discussion is carried out by the Board of Directors of the Company, and the effectiveness is secured.
The reasons why we confirmed that the effectiveness is secured are as follows.
- a. External Directors (Independent) and External Audit and Supervisory Board Members (Independent) are engaged in activities to understand the Company’s business outside of the Board of Directors, such as the inspection of business and the opportunity to interact with employees.
- b. The Board of Directors, of which the majority is composed of External Directors (Independent), has open and lively discussions based on their knowledge and management experiences gained outside of the Company.
- c. For the revision of the medium-term management plan, deep deliberations are made focusing on capital efficiency.
Assessments of the Effectiveness of the Board of Directors and Improvement Measures
Evaluation Result (Issues and Concerns) | Progress/Plan of Initiatives for Improvement | |
---|---|---|
Previous Fiscal Year (ended March 31, 2023) |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Fiscal Year (ended March 31, 2024) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our plan is to further strengthen the supervisory and/or advisory functions of our Board of Directors by further utilizing the knowledge of External Directors (Independent), while continuing to implement the initiatives described above. |
Revisions in Wacoal’s Corporate Governance System
1977 | Wacoal issues ADRs*(American Depositary Receipts) |
Wacoal becomes the eighth Japanese company to issue ADRs. Upon issuance, the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) requires consolidated financial statements and accounting reports in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
---|---|---|
2002 | Introduction of the corporate officer system → Number of directors: 13 → 9 |
In June 2002, the Company employs a corporate officer system in order to delegate authority and clarify responsibility more appropriately and efficiently. At the same time, the number of directors is reduced. |
2005 | Establishment of a pure holding company | The Company transfers to a pure holding company system to facilitate decision-making on Groupwide strategy, to optimize the allocation of resources, and to clarify the responsibilities and authority of operating companies so that they can execute operations flexibly. |
Appointment of outside officers | To promote the fairness and independence of the Board of Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board, the Group increases the number of outside directors by two members and the number of outside Audit & Supervisory Board members by one member. | |
2007 | Establishment of the Executive Compensation Advisory Committee → Number of committee members (including outside directors): 4 |
Regarding the appointment, promotion, and remuneration of the directors and executive officers, the Executive Compensation Advisory Committee, chaired by the director of the Administrative Department, is established with outside directors included as members. |
2010 | Registration of all outside officers with the Tokyo Stock Exchange as independent officers → Number of independent officers registered: 6 |
All outside directors and outside Audit & Supervisory Board members are registered with the Tokyo Stock Exchange as independent officers. |
2015 | Establishment of the Independent Outside Officers Meeting | The Independent Outside Officers Meeting is established with the intention of sharing information about improving corporate governance, meetings of the Board of Directors, internal audits, etc. The committee includes independent outside officers. |
2018 | Establishment of the Executive Compensation Advisory Committee and the Executive Nomination Advisory Committee | The Executive Compensation Advisory Committee, which was established in 2007, becomes the Executive Compensation Advisory Committee and the Executive Nomination Advisory Committee. |
2021 | Introduction of Compensation Framework in the Form of Restricted Stock | We have introduced a restricted stock compensation plan for Directors (excluding outside directors)and discontinue the share-based stock options, for further sharing of price fluctuation risk with our shareholders and increasing incentives to contribute to the improvement of share price and corporate value. |
2022 | Revised the ratio of base compensation and stock compensation | Compensation of Officers consists of "base compensation," "performance-based bonuses," and "Transfer-restricted stock compensation. Revised the ratios of stock compensation to basic compensation so that stock compensation accounts for a larger percentage of the compensation of officers as they rise in rank. |
2024 | Introduction of Performance-Linked Stock Remuneration Plan | We have introduced a Performance Share Unit for directors (excluding External directors) in order to clarify the link between compensation and company performance and our share value, and to further increase motivation to contribute to improving our corporate value. |
* In 2013, Wacoal stopped listing ADRs on the U.S. NASDAQ market and de-registered with the SEC.